Socialization Leads To Identity Formation

assimilation Leads To individuation operator FormationWhat is culture? socializing is the do work in which humanity worlds interact with for each one other undividedly and in groups. It is the process by which one figures the traditions, customs and accepted behaviour in any prone society. It is non a onetime process, solely it is a sustenancelong process that provides individuals with skills, value and attitudes that ar necessary for interacting with the society. Human beings need social experiences to direct their culture and survive in the society. They are not born with values and skills. They delay from what they see, hear and experience throughout their life. They have the capability to picture and absorb from what they see roughly them. Socialization is not a notwithstanding a simple term that can be seen at take care value. It has many layers, and each layer is different from the other and crests to different processes and situations. Socialization has three layers primary, secondary and tertiary. Primary is what we learn from our family and when we are young, secondary is what we learn in discipline, and tertiary is what we learn throughout our lives.We straightaway know what socialising means, but what is individuality? Identity is what makes an individual who he actually is and what his economic consumption in life is. It is what makes an individual defin equal and recognizable. It is who you are and where you come from and what makes you crotchety from every other human being. It gives an individual a sense of being. Identity can be defined as individuality, personality, distinctiveness or singularity that makes an individual stand out. Like socialization, identicalness too cannot be seen at face value. Identity has many layers to itself, and as we walk through life, each new layer keeps unfolding in front of us.Now, since we know what socialization and identity both mean, we can bring them together and relate them to behave our examination does socialization lead to identity haomaation? Well, I call yes, socialization does lead to identity formation as we discover who we really are and where we fit in, simply in the midst of people and in our interaction with them. Once we start interacting with the society, we learn so much astir(predicate) ourselves as well as closely others (individuals or societies), their culture, customs, behaviour, etc. We learn that we are similar to some people, and different from others. Socialization makes an individual more than(prenominal) confident. The more people we talk to, the more topics we talk about, and this in acetify widens our scope. Also, we make ourselves more visible to society and hence people spot us. Thus socialization helps in building ones identity. Todays world is all about power and identity. If one has an identity as well as the correct attitude, he can achieve whatever he wants. Socializing too leads to better networking. Better networking means more connections and more connections means higher(prenominal) opportunities at work or elsewhere as well. Hence socialization leads to a boost in ones career or talent and olibanumly helps in identity formation.The more we interact with people, the more we discover ourselves and form judgements about ourselves as well as others. One is only able to discover his true self when he interacts with others and reacts in certain shipway that are different from others. Everyone has a different and unique reaction to a certain situation. This uniqueness is what gives an individual his identity. For example, if we see Phillip Zimbardos Stanford Prison Study try out (Zimbardo, 1971), that was undertaken to study the behavioural and psychological consequences of becoming a prisoner or prison guard, we observe that the prisoners started to lose their identity, and didnt see it as an experiment, but as a real prison run by psychologist. They forgot that they were actually unspoilt college students and not actually prisoners. The prisoners actually gave up their freedom and forgot their rights and liberties. The situation was much(prenominal)(prenominal) that it made them feel that way. The environment was so realistic that they actually believed they were prisoners and thus behaved in rebellion. It is the prisoners who created in the guards a sadistic impulse. The guards were compelled to act in shipway that were totally opposite from what they were feeling inside. But few of the guards were actually cruel, and snarl no guilt or regret while doing their job. They had completely doomed themselves and started behaving in the role that was assigned to them, i.e. the role of a prison guard. The prisoners as well as the guards lost their true identity and became what the situation take them to be. The fresh prison routine, the privilege cell for the obedient ones and the hole for those who were punished, the dress they were made to wear, the food the y were made to eat, the number given to them by which they were now addressed, made them lose their true identity and become someone else. Thus, from this experiment we learn that situations affect us more than we think. What the volunteers in this experiment undergo was the power of the situation and not anything to do with their personality. Prisons are institutions which attempt to unloosen individuals of their previous identity, and this can be clearly seen in Zimbardos prison experiment. some other example is The Clark Doll Experiment (Clark, 1939) that was carried out by Dr. Kenneth Clark and his wife, where they asked relentless children to fill amongst a black doll and a white doll. nigh of the children said the white doll was nicer, prettier and the one they takered playing with, whereas the black doll was the bragging(a) doll. All these children were eldd from 6 to 9 only and were already so damaged by racism at such a young age. This racism was due to the work s egregation between white and black kids. It was distorting their minds, causing them to have stereotypes and hate themselves. When asked the last question of the experiment-which doll looks like you? the children hesitated and answered. They wanted to choose the white doll, but reluctantly pick the black one. Thus, prejudice, discrimination and segregation caused black children to civilize a sense of inferiority and self hatred. These children were embarrassed of who they truly were, and hated themselves for being black. They wanted to be white like the other kids. Thus, they lost their identity at such a young age and in event were ashamed of who they actually were. They preferred being someone else.Thus, socialization does lead to identity formation, and this identity formation starts at a young age itself. Even before children learn the basic dos and donts. So, it is very beta to keep children away from bad influences and situations that can make them form bad judgements and ideas about themselves.Now, arguing against the motion, socialization leads to identity formation, I would completely discord upon this statement. Identity is who we are and where we come from. We form our identity by how we behave, how our family has brought us up, what education we get, where our interests lie, etc. It is what we do and how we behave as individuals that form our identity and make us who we truly are. Socialization has nothing to do with identity formation. Socialization will not pour knowledge or talents into an individual it will not build ones identity. It is important because we get to know more people, and get to widen our base. But it doesnt form who we are. It is we ourselves who from who we are, not the people around us.Primary and Tertiary socialization may lead to identity formation, but I can confidently say that Secondary socialization does not lead to identity formation. This can be proved by capital of Minnesota Williss Learning to Labour How Working sectionalization Kids Get Working Class Jobs (Willis, 1977). In this study, we see that it is the family that gives the children their identity and even schooling could not depart this identity. This is because the school did not teach them what they actually required in life and what they need to live life the way their society lives it. It is the students who distance themselves from the school culture and requirements, and develop their own counterculture. They are resistant to the schooling, and reject what the school offers to them. Willis finds that they are not less talented, but they do develop an repulsion towards the work hard move forward mentality of modern education, and develop what Willis terms as counter school culture (Willis, 1977). Thus, these children do not form a different identity that their school wants them to become. They stick to what their family has taught them and what their family requires them to be. Their family requires them to be labourers, who earn their living by hard work and labour, not by sitting on a desk and signing papers. Thus, these children reject the education and school culture that schooling is supposed to embed in a student, and prefer living life the way their family has been doing so, not because they want to, but because it is their duty, it is who they are and where they belong.